DIGINOVA: Journal of Digital Business and Innovation applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific contribution of every submitted manuscript. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential.

All submitted manuscripts are first evaluated by the editorial team to assess their suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, as well as compliance with basic submission requirements. Manuscripts that pass this initial screening are then assigned to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, scientific quality, clarity of presentation, methodology, relevance, and contribution to the field of digital business and innovation. Reviewers are expected to provide constructive feedback and clear recommendations such as acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection.

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the editor makes the final decision regarding the manuscript. If revisions are required, authors are given the opportunity to improve their manuscript according to the reviewers’ comments before a final decision is made.

The average review process may vary depending on reviewer availability and manuscript revisions, but the journal is committed to ensuring a fair, timely, and high-quality review process in accordance with COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) standards.